RandomizEd phase II trial of Sunitinib four weeks on and two weeks off versus Two weeks on and One week off in metastatic clear-cell type REnal cell carcinoma: RESTORE trial

  • Lee, J.L.; 
  • Kim, M.K.; 
  • Park, I.; 
  • Ahn, J.-H.; 
  • Lee, D.H.; 
  • 외 5명
Citations

WEB OF SCIENCE

88
Citations

SCOPUS

100

초록

Background: The standard sunitinib schedule, 4 weeks on, followed by 2 weeks off (4/2 schedule), is associated with troublesome toxicities, and maintenance of adequate sunitinib dosing and drug levels, which are essential for achieving an optimal treatment outcome, is challenging. The objective of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of an alternative sunitinib dosing schedule of 2 weeks on and 1 week off (2/1 schedule) compared with the standard sunitinib schedule of 4 weeks on and 2 weeks off (4/2 schedule). Patients and methods: In this multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase II trial, treatment-naïve patients with clear-cell type metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) were randomly assigned to 4/2 or 2/1 schedules after stratification by Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center risk group and the presence or absence of measurable lesions. The primary end point was the 6-month failure-free survival (FFS) rate, determined by intention-to-treat analysis. Results: From November 2007 to February 2014, 76 patients were accrued, and 74 were eligible. FFS rates at 6 months were 44% with the 4/2 schedule (N = 36) and 63% with the 2/1 schedule (N = 38). Neutropenia (all grades, 61% versus 37%; grade 3-4, 28% versus 11%) and fatigue (all grades, 83% versus 58%) were more frequently observed with schedule 4/2. There was a strong tendency toward a lower incidence of stomatitis, hand-foot syndrome, and rash with schedule 2/1. Objective response rates (ORRs) were 47% in schedule 2/1 and 36% in schedule 4/2. With a median follow-up of 30.0 months, the median time to progression (TTP) was 12.1 months in schedule 2/1 and 10.1 months in schedule 4/2. Conclusion: Sunitinib administered with a 2/1 schedule is associated with less toxicity and higher FFS at 6 months than a 4/2 schedule, without compromising the efficacy in terms of ORR and TTP (NCT00570882). © The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved.

키워드

Alternative dosing; failure-free survival; randomized trial; renal cell carcinoma; sunitinib; sunitinib; antineoplastic agent; indole derivative; pyrrole derivative; sunitinib; adult; aged; Article; cancer fatigue; cancer risk; cancer survival; cancer susceptibility; clinical effectiveness; controlled study; dosage schedule comparison; drug dose reduction; drug efficacy; drug response; drug safety; drug tolerability; failure free survival; female; follow up; hand foot syndrome; human; intention to treat analysis; kidney carcinoma; major clinical study; male; metastasis; metastasis potential; multicenter study; neutropenia; overall survival; phase 2 clinical trial; priority journal; randomized controlled trial; rash; risk assessment; risk factor; stomatitis; survival rate; survival time; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; clinical trial; comparative study; drug administration; middle aged; Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Indoles; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrroles
제목
RandomizEd phase II trial of Sunitinib four weeks on and two weeks off versus Two weeks on and One week off in metastatic clear-cell type REnal cell carcinoma: RESTORE trial
저자
Lee, J.L.; Kim, M.K.; Park, I.; Ahn, J.-H.; Lee, D.H.; Ryoo, H.M.; Song, C.; Hong, B.; Hong, J.H.; Ahn, H.
DOI
10.1093/annonc/mdv357
발행일
2015-11
유형
Article
저널명
Annals of Oncology
권
26
호
11
페이지
2300 ~ 2305